FROM THE GUIDE · SHOOTING IN THE U.S.
Every city is its own country.
If you are producing from Europe and the script says Los Angeles, one of the first searches is usually “film permit Los Angeles”. Behind it are two practical questions: who do I ask, and what will it change in my plan. The answer starts with a principle from our guide: in American production, every city is its own country. What a permit involves depends on where exactly the camera stands, and that is decided long before anyone writes a call sheet.
Across much of Los Angeles, FilmLA centralizes many permitting processes. For a European producer that is useful news. For a large part of the area there is one main door to knock on, rather than a separate conversation for every street.
The important words are “much” and “many”. Certain cities, properties and jurisdictions keep their own circuits. A location that a visitor would simply call Los Angeles can sit in a city, or on a property, that runs its own process. That is why the first permit question is never “how do I get a permit for Los Angeles”. It is “whose jurisdiction is this exact location in”.
Asked early, that question is a line on the location sheet. Asked late, it can mean a second process you did not plan for, on a location you have already sold to the director.
New York adds layers. The city’s film office handles the streets. Parks have their own track. Private buildings go through their property managers. Large public facilities answer to sovereign authorities, with their own clocks.
Putting the two cities side by side makes the point clear. The same creative idea, a street, a park, a station, opens a different set of conversations depending on the city and on who controls the place.
FIELD NOTE · NEW YORK
Creative ask: a sequence on live subway platforms.
What it looked like: a location decision.
What it actually triggered: a transit authority with its own process, months of lead time, operating conditions, specific insurance and dedicated logistics.
Lesson: institutional locations don’t get added to the schedule. They determine it.
The subway case shows a common misreading. On paper it was a location choice. In practice it set the calendar. Institutional locations, the ones that belong to an authority with its own process, are not slots you fit into a plan that already exists. They arrive with their own lead time, their own operating conditions, their own insurance requirements and their own logistics, and the rest of the shoot is built around them.
For a European producer this changes the order of work. If the script depends on an institutional location, that location is one of the first things to analyze, not one of the last things to book. The creative conversation and the permit conversation have to happen at the same table.
Documentary works the other way round. The story moves, and a location can open up with a few hours’ notice. From the outside that looks like improvisation. In practice it depends on knowing when paper is needed and when the space’s permission, with insurance already live, is enough.
The lesson from the guide: in documentary, agility isn’t the absence of structure. It’s structure preloaded. The insurance is already in place before the opportunity appears, and the team already knows which kind of location needs a permit and which only needs the space’s permission. Then the answer on the day can be fast without being careless.
None of these questions is difficult on its own. They become a problem when they are asked after the schedule has already been built.
This article comes from our free guide, Shooting in the U.S. without learning American production during the shoot. It covers immigration, permits, unions, insurance, payroll and how the American budget reads, with field notes from real productions. In Spanish: Rodar en Estados Unidos.
Have a shoot coming up? The first call is a diagnosis, not a sale.
SEND US THE BRIEF